🎙️ AI Voice
Cartesia vs Fish Audio
Which is better depends on the job. Here's how they compare on facts and — where we've run them — our standardized tests.
Low-latency AI voice models and API.
Text-to-speech and voice cloning platform.
Which should you choose?
NOT YET TESTED We won't name a winner until both tools have completed the same test tasks. Until then, use the verified facts below.
Scores by job
| Job | Cartesia | Fish Audio |
|---|---|---|
| Long-form narration (audiobook, e-learning) | NOT YET TESTED | NOT YET TESTED |
| Real-time voice agent (low latency) | NOT YET TESTED | NOT YET TESTED |
| Cloning a voice (with consent) | NOT YET TESTED | NOT YET TESTED |
| Multilingual voiceover & dubbing | NOT YET TESTED | NOT YET TESTED |
| Short ad / social voiceover | NOT YET TESTED | NOT YET TESTED |
Facts side by side
From official pages; "Not yet verified" means we haven't confirmed it yet.
| Cartesia | Fish Audio | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Cartesia | Hanabi AI Inc. |
| Starting price | from $5/mo | from $15/mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Not yet verified | Not yet verified |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Commercial use | Paid plans only | Paid plans only |
| Last tested | Never | Never |
| Facts updated | Oct 8, 2026 | Oct 8, 2026 |
Cartesia vs Fish Audio: same prompt, raw outputs
Same input for every tool. We publish the first output (no cherry-picking), with the date, plan and model version used, plus a SHA-256 hash of the file.
When the test round runs, each task appears here as a row with one column per tool.
Head-to-head measurements
Objective metrics recorded by our test harness (same inputs for every tool). Raw outputs are archived as evidence.
Blind quality comparison
Subjective assessment by our evaluators, blind where possible. This is opinion, labelled as such — not a measured fact.