📊 AI Presentations
Beautiful.ai vs Gamma
Which is better depends on the job. Here's how they compare on facts and — where we've run them — our standardized tests.
Presentation software with AI-assisted slide design.
AI tool for creating presentations, documents and web pages.
Which should you choose?
NOT YET TESTED We won't name a winner until both tools have completed the same test tasks. Until then, use the verified facts below.
Scores by job
| Job | Beautiful.ai | Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| Investor pitch deck from a brief | NOT YET TESTED | NOT YET TESTED |
| Turn a long report into a deck | NOT YET TESTED | NOT YET TESTED |
| On-brand slides inside PowerPoint / Google Slides | NOT YET TESTED | NOT YET TESTED |
| Lesson slides for teachers | NOT YET TESTED | NOT YET TESTED |
Facts side by side
From official pages; "Not yet verified" means we haven't confirmed it yet.
| Beautiful.ai | Gamma | |
|---|---|---|
| Company | Beautiful.ai | Gamma |
| Starting price | from $14.50/mo | from $12/mo |
| Free plan | Not yet verified | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Not yet verified |
| API | Not yet verified | Yes |
| Commercial use | Not applicable | Not yet verified |
| Last tested | Never | Never |
| Facts updated | Oct 8, 2026 | Oct 8, 2026 |
Beautiful.ai vs Gamma: same prompt, raw outputs
Same input for every tool. We publish the first output (no cherry-picking), with the date, plan and model version used, plus a SHA-256 hash of the file.
When the test round runs, each task appears here as a row with one column per tool.
Head-to-head measurements
Objective metrics recorded by our test harness (same inputs for every tool). Raw outputs are archived as evidence.
Blind quality comparison
Subjective assessment by our evaluators, blind where possible. This is opinion, labelled as such — not a measured fact.